Price Cuts by State
Price cuts here means the share of active listings where the seller has reduced the asking price, per Redfin. It is not the share of homes that sold below asking, and it is not the average size of the discount. Those are three different measurements and they are routinely reported as if they were one. The first is on this page as its own column; the second is the sale-to-list ratio, also on the table; the third is not published by any free source at this grain, so it is not here. The underlying field is Redfin's PRICE_DROPS, taken from the Redfin Data Center without transformation, and this page ranks it rather than folding it into a score. Market data is as of May 31, 2026. Free, no signup, no email gate — every number on this page is in the raw JSON as current.priceDropPct, one file per region: /api/states/{slug}.json for states (example) and /data/counties/{slug}.json for counties (example). The summary endpoint /api/states/index.json does not carry this field.
Price cuts by state
All 51 rows — the 50 states plus the District of Columbia — with no filter applied and none needed: every one carries the field and the whole range fits between 17.3% and 36.5%. Read the coloring the opposite way from most tables on this site: a high share of listings being cut favors buyers, so the 6 highest are green and the 6 lowest are red. Negotiation gap is 1 minus the sale-to-list ratio, the room between the last ask and the closing price; a negative gap means homes in that state are closing above ask on average. Sold above list is the share of closings that exceeded the asking price.
| # | State | Listings With a Price Cut | Sale-to-List Ratio | Negotiation Gap | Sold Above List | Median Days on Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Indiana | 36.5% | 0.9833 | +1.67% | 22.7% | 26 days |
| 2 | Colorado | 33.9% | 0.9884 | +1.16% | 23.9% | 35 days |
| 3 | Texas | 33.9% | 0.9719 | +2.81% | 14.1% | 56 days |
| 4 | Washington | 33.8% | 0.9980 | +0.20% | 30.9% | 19 days |
| 5 | Oregon | 32.8% | 0.9954 | +0.46% | 31.0% | 28 days |
| 6 | Minnesota | 32.5% | 1.0003 | -0.03% | 39.3% | 25 days |
| 7 | Idaho | 32.3% | 0.9915 | +0.85% | 17.3% | 35 days |
| 8 | Georgia | 31.7% | 0.9807 | +1.93% | 20.0% | 49 days |
| 9 | Nebraska | 31.5% | 1.0002 | -0.02% | 42.5% | 27 days |
| 10 | Kansas | 31.1% | 0.9728 | +2.72% | 17.6% | 19 days |
| 11 | Arizona | 30.9% | 0.9803 | +1.97% | 14.6% | 62 days |
| 12 | Utah | 30.4% | 0.9901 | +0.99% | 24.0% | 41 days |
| 13 | Kentucky | 30.3% | 0.9784 | +2.16% | 20.2% | 45 days |
| 14 | Iowa | 30.2% | 0.9824 | +1.76% | 23.1% | 37 days |
| 15 | North Carolina | 29.6% | 0.9830 | +1.70% | 18.7% | 52 days |
| 16 | Missouri | 29.4% | 0.9814 | +1.86% | 23.9% | 27 days |
| 17 | Oklahoma | 29.1% | 0.9786 | +2.14% | 18.4% | 39 days |
| 18 | Maryland | 29.0% | 1.0019 | -0.19% | 39.9% | 34 days |
| 19 | Delaware | 28.8% | 0.9967 | +0.33% | 34.2% | 33 days |
| 20 | South Carolina | 28.8% | 0.9804 | +1.96% | 13.7% | 72 days |
| 21 | Florida | 28.5% | 0.9668 | +3.32% | 11.1% | 66 days |
| 22 | Pennsylvania | 28.1% | 0.9971 | +0.29% | 37.9% | 30 days |
| 23 | Louisiana | 28.1% | 0.9719 | +2.81% | 12.4% | 55 days |
| 24 | Michigan | 27.9% | 0.9951 | +0.49% | 38.4% | 24 days |
| 25 | Virginia | 27.4% | 1.0007 | -0.07% | 39.1% | 28 days |
| 26 | Tennessee | 27.2% | 0.9781 | +2.19% | 16.1% | 61 days |
| 27 | Mississippi | 27.0% | 0.9738 | +2.62% | 10.9% | 47 days |
| 28 | Massachusetts | 26.9% | 1.0143 | -1.43% | 52.5% | 21 days |
| 29 | Alaska | 26.8% | 0.9973 | +0.27% | 27.6% | 22 days |
| 30 | Nevada | 26.8% | 0.9852 | +1.48% | 20.7% | 52 days |
| 31 | District of Columbia | 26.6% | 0.9958 | +0.42% | 28.8% | 47 days |
| 32 | California | 26.1% | 1.0068 | -0.68% | 41.1% | 33 days |
| 33 | Arkansas | 26.0% | 0.9741 | +2.59% | 13.8% | 53 days |
| 34 | Ohio | 25.9% | 0.9936 | +0.64% | 36.8% | 36 days |
| 35 | Alabama | 24.7% | 0.9791 | +2.09% | 18.1% | 57 days |
| 36 | West Virginia | 24.6% | 0.9766 | +2.34% | 24.0% | 50 days |
| 37 | Maine | 23.5% | 0.9856 | +1.44% | 29.8% | 45 days |
| 38 | North Dakota | 23.3% | 0.9832 | +1.68% | 8.4% | 44 days |
| 39 | New Mexico | 22.6% | 0.9895 | +1.05% | 5.0% | 53 days |
| 40 | New York | 21.9% | 1.0175 | -1.75% | 42.6% | 42 days |
| 41 | Wyoming | 20.8% | 0.9812 | +1.88% | 5.8% | 51 days |
| 42 | New Hampshire | 20.4% | 1.0053 | -0.53% | 46.3% | 38 days |
| 43 | South Dakota | 20.3% | 0.9795 | +2.05% | 16.7% | 49 days |
| 44 | Rhode Island | 20.0% | 1.0092 | -0.92% | 51.0% | 26 days |
| 45 | Vermont | 19.2% | 0.9827 | +1.73% | 28.5% | 64 days |
| 46 | Montana | 19.2% | — | — | 0.0% | 69 days |
| 47 | New Jersey | 19.1% | 1.0211 | -2.11% | 52.0% | 35 days |
| 48 | Connecticut | 18.6% | 1.0369 | -3.69% | 62.9% | 31 days |
| 49 | Illinois | 17.7% | 1.0038 | -0.38% | 43.6% | 43 days |
| 50 | Wisconsin | 17.3% | 1.0050 | -0.50% | 44.8% | 44 days |
| 51 | Hawaii | 17.3% | 0.9780 | +2.20% | 19.0% | 86 days |
Counties where the most listings are being cut — top 100
A county appears here only if its latest reported month is May 31, 2026 and it recorded at least 100 sales in that month. 640 counties clear both. The filter is not cosmetic. Unfiltered, 2,884 of the 3,073 counties carry the field, and 42 of them read above 60% — 12 of that 42 read exactly 100%, meaning every single active listing had been cut. Those are thin markets with a handful of listings, not the country's most desperate sellers. Under the filter the range collapses to 9.6% to 63.5% and the 100% readings disappear entirely. 223 counties were dropped for reporting an older month, 2,208 for volume.
| # | County | State | Listings With a Price Cut | Homes Sold | Median Sale Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Columbia County | Georgia | 63.5% | 230 | $361,500 |
| 2 | Richmond County | Georgia | 63.0% | 160 | $218,000 |
| 3 | Daviess County | Kentucky | 54.5% | 113 | $225,000 |
| 4 | Morgan County | Indiana | 50.3% | 108 | $305,000 |
| 5 | Guadalupe County | Texas | 49.8% | 331 | $298,290 |
| 6 | Madison County | Indiana | 45.6% | 187 | $221,062 |
| 7 | Boone County | Indiana | 45.2% | 148 | $410,300 |
| 8 | Montgomery County | Texas | 44.5% | 1,457 | $346,740 |
| 9 | Kenton County | Kentucky | 44.0% | 237 | $300,000 |
| 10 | Aiken County | South Carolina | 43.5% | 225 | $308,450 |
| 11 | Douglas County | Colorado | 43.3% | 616 | $719,900 |
| 12 | Arapahoe County | Colorado | 43.3% | 779 | $560,000 |
| 13 | Johnson County | Indiana | 43.2% | 242 | $320,750 |
| 14 | Jefferson County | Colorado | 43.2% | 830 | $660,000 |
| 15 | Marion County | Indiana | 43.1% | 1,263 | $260,000 |
| 16 | Denver County | Colorado | 42.7% | 988 | $628,750 |
| 17 | Dauphin County | Pennsylvania | 42.5% | 261 | $295,000 |
| 18 | Spartanburg County | South Carolina | 42.5% | 601 | $289,000 |
| 19 | Liberty County | Texas | 42.5% | 105 | $270,000 |
| 20 | Hamilton County | Indiana | 42.3% | 700 | $474,900 |
| 21 | Boone County | Kentucky | 42.2% | 176 | $344,000 |
| 22 | Hendricks County | Indiana | 42.0% | 302 | $350,000 |
| 23 | Brazoria County | Texas | 41.9% | 418 | $345,000 |
| 24 | Bartholomew County | Indiana | 41.8% | 113 | $289,900 |
| 25 | Campbell County | Kentucky | 41.4% | 132 | $305,000 |
| 26 | Rock Island County | Illinois | 41.3% | 151 | $165,900 |
| 27 | Kalamazoo County | Michigan | 40.8% | 279 | $305,000 |
| 28 | Olmsted County | Minnesota | 40.7% | 251 | $365,000 |
| 29 | Shawnee County | Kansas | 40.2% | 220 | $229,000 |
| 30 | Waller County | Texas | 40.0% | 175 | $345,000 |
| 31 | Pasco County | Florida | 40.0% | 1,048 | $365,000 |
| 32 | Bonneville County | Idaho | 40.0% | 140 | $407,000 |
| 33 | Muskegon County | Michigan | 39.9% | 174 | $252,500 |
| 34 | Hillsborough County | Florida | 39.7% | 1,824 | $405,000 |
| 35 | Hernando County | Florida | 39.6% | 369 | $315,000 |
| 36 | Hancock County | Indiana | 39.6% | 174 | $349,745 |
| 37 | Wake County | North Carolina | 39.5% | 1,643 | $482,500 |
| 38 | Roanoke County | Virginia | 39.4% | 285 | $295,000 |
| 39 | Sumter County | Florida | 39.4% | 205 | $345,000 |
| 40 | Snohomish County | Washington | 38.9% | 859 | $760,000 |
| 41 | Paulding County | Georgia | 38.9% | 238 | $351,500 |
| 42 | Collin County | Texas | 38.8% | 1,603 | $476,000 |
| 43 | Rockwall County | Texas | 38.8% | 192 | $420,000 |
| 44 | Tippecanoe County | Indiana | 38.7% | 197 | $305,000 |
| 45 | Roanoke City County | Virginia | 38.7% | 128 | $250,500 |
| 46 | Seminole County | Florida | 38.6% | 533 | $412,000 |
| 47 | Wright County | Minnesota | 38.6% | 228 | $398,150 |
| 48 | Spokane County | Washington | 38.4% | 615 | $447,500 |
| 49 | Denton County | Texas | 38.4% | 1,391 | $460,000 |
| 50 | Cumberland County | Pennsylvania | 38.3% | 258 | $320,500 |
| 51 | Dakota County | Minnesota | 38.3% | 554 | $404,450 |
| 52 | Hays County | Texas | 38.3% | 395 | $371,540 |
| 53 | Washington County | Oregon | 38.3% | 610 | $565,500 |
| 54 | Adams County | Colorado | 38.2% | 676 | $515,000 |
| 55 | Scott County | Iowa | 37.9% | 226 | $235,000 |
| 56 | Jasper County | South Carolina | 37.9% | 113 | $416,240 |
| 57 | Pierce County | Washington | 37.9% | 967 | $585,000 |
| 58 | Johnson County | Texas | 37.7% | 279 | $335,000 |
| 59 | Grayson County | Texas | 37.6% | 229 | $315,000 |
| 60 | Williamson County | Texas | 37.4% | 1,046 | $408,000 |
| 61 | Ada County | Idaho | 37.4% | 1,074 | $553,000 |
| 62 | Allegan County | Michigan | 37.3% | 120 | $349,650 |
| 63 | Carver County | Minnesota | 37.2% | 185 | $460,620 |
| 64 | Wyandotte County | Kansas | 37.1% | 153 | $250,500 |
| 65 | Franklin County | North Carolina | 37.1% | 115 | $393,000 |
| 66 | Fort Bend County | Texas | 37.0% | 1,037 | $399,872 |
| 67 | Erie County | Pennsylvania | 37.0% | 190 | $230,000 |
| 68 | Pinellas County | Florida | 37.0% | 1,562 | $410,000 |
| 69 | Bexar County | Texas | 36.9% | 1,934 | $295,000 |
| 70 | Hood County | Texas | 36.9% | 142 | $382,500 |
| 71 | Ascension Parish | Louisiana | 36.9% | 156 | $306,281 |
| 72 | Twin Falls County | Idaho | 36.8% | 107 | $372,900 |
| 73 | Shasta County | California | 36.8% | 190 | $380,000 |
| 74 | Clackamas County | Oregon | 36.6% | 474 | $650,000 |
| 75 | Butler County | Kansas | 36.6% | 103 | $267,322 |
| 76 | Kent County | Michigan | 36.5% | 718 | $365,000 |
| 77 | Tazewell County | Illinois | 36.5% | 164 | $186,750 |
| 78 | Franklin County | Pennsylvania | 36.4% | 142 | $290,000 |
| 79 | Kitsap County | Washington | 36.4% | 343 | $600,058 |
| 80 | Calhoun County | Michigan | 36.3% | 118 | $185,200 |
| 81 | Sullivan County | Tennessee | 36.3% | 231 | $290,000 |
| 82 | Catawba County | North Carolina | 36.3% | 194 | $345,522 |
| 83 | Macon County | Illinois | 36.2% | 121 | $150,000 |
| 84 | Washington County | Minnesota | 36.2% | 394 | $430,000 |
| 85 | Ottawa County | Michigan | 36.2% | 304 | $415,000 |
| 86 | Comal County | Texas | 36.0% | 263 | $439,900 |
| 87 | Manatee County | Florida | 36.0% | 1,066 | $414,535 |
| 88 | Thurston County | Washington | 35.9% | 329 | $535,000 |
| 89 | Citrus County | Florida | 35.9% | 408 | $280,000 |
| 90 | Scott County | Minnesota | 35.8% | 220 | $454,445 |
| 91 | Clark County | Indiana | 35.7% | 200 | $276,200 |
| 92 | Lane County | Oregon | 35.7% | 308 | $462,870 |
| 93 | Davis County | Utah | 35.6% | 299 | $525,000 |
| 94 | Clark County | Washington | 35.5% | 577 | $579,900 |
| 95 | Multnomah County | Oregon | 35.3% | 864 | $538,000 |
| 96 | Forsyth County | Georgia | 35.3% | 316 | $642,500 |
| 97 | Cleveland County | North Carolina | 35.3% | 108 | $260,495 |
| 98 | Lincoln County | North Carolina | 35.2% | 143 | $410,000 |
| 99 | Christian County | Missouri | 35.2% | 140 | $331,950 |
| 100 | St. Clair County | Michigan | 35.2% | 141 | $239,900 |
Counties where the fewest listings are being cut — bottom 25
Same pool, same filter, ranked from the lowest share upward. These are the markets where sellers are least often revising the ask, which usually tracks tight inventory rather than seller stubbornness. The median across the 640 ranked counties is 28.8%.
| # | County | State | Listings With a Price Cut | Homes Sold | Median Sale Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bergen County | New Jersey | 9.6% | 534 | $790,000 |
| 2 | Marathon County | Wisconsin | 9.8% | 104 | $290,000 |
| 3 | Winnebago County | Wisconsin | 11.0% | 164 | $272,490 |
| 4 | Waukesha County | Wisconsin | 11.6% | 500 | $507,000 |
| 5 | Ozaukee County | Wisconsin | 12.0% | 112 | $509,950 |
| 6 | Brown County | Wisconsin | 12.0% | 262 | $390,000 |
| 7 | Essex County | New Jersey | 12.2% | 466 | $725,000 |
| 8 | Washington County | Wisconsin | 12.3% | 181 | $430,000 |
| 9 | Washington County | Rhode Island | 12.6% | 119 | $635,000 |
| 10 | Outagamie County | Wisconsin | 12.8% | 150 | $357,500 |
| 11 | Kenosha County | Wisconsin | 12.8% | 143 | $366,000 |
| 12 | McHenry County | Illinois | 13.1% | 396 | $366,000 |
| 13 | Lake County | Illinois | 13.6% | 777 | $434,429 |
| 14 | Yuma County | Arizona | 13.8% | 142 | $339,900 |
| 15 | Passaic County | New Jersey | 13.8% | 249 | $611,000 |
| 16 | Kent County | Rhode Island | 14.1% | 154 | $442,500 |
| 17 | DuPage County | Illinois | 14.1% | 942 | $460,000 |
| 18 | Union County | New Jersey | 14.1% | 310 | $714,000 |
| 19 | Middlesex County | New Jersey | 14.2% | 517 | $540,000 |
| 20 | Kane County | Illinois | 14.2% | 583 | $409,990 |
| 21 | Cook County | Illinois | 14.3% | 4,963 | $390,000 |
| 22 | Hunterdon County | New Jersey | 14.3% | 104 | $620,000 |
| 23 | Johnson County | Iowa | 14.4% | 283 | $342,500 |
| 24 | Monroe County | New York | 14.5% | 487 | $300,000 |
| 25 | San Francisco County | California | 14.7% | 561 | $1,770,000 |
How this page differs from the other buyer-leverage pages
Four pages on this site touch the same Redfin field and they answer different questions. This is the disambiguation, stated plainly, so you do not have to guess which one you landed on.
| Page | Grain | What it measures | How price cuts enter it |
|---|---|---|---|
| This page | State + county | One raw Redfin field, ranked. Nothing is scored, weighted, or combined. | It is the ranking. |
| Listing velocity decay | City | A composite seller-weakness score built from four signals: price cuts, days-on-market spike, inventory surplus, and the sale-to-list gap. | One of four inputs, weighted 35 of the score band. |
| Seller motivation index | County | A composite of seller-side pressure, scored on the same scale as the single-listing tool on that page. | One input among several, not the headline. |
| Market movers | County | What changed most in the latest refresh — the latest month against the mean of the prior three, read from each county trend history. | Change-based, not level-based. A market can have few cuts and still move most. |
Method, limits, and common questions
- The field, and where it comes from.
priceDropPctis Redfin'sPRICE_DROPScolumn from the Redfin Data Center market tracker, read into our pipeline untransformed. Our own glossary defines it as "the percentage of active listings where the seller has reduced their asking price". Nothing is smoothed, weighted, or reweighted on this page. - It is a fraction in the source, a percentage here. The raw field is 0 to 1 — Indiana stores as 0.3652. Every cell above is that value times 100. If you pull the JSON yourself and see 0.3652, that is 36.5%, not 0.37%.
- What it is not. It is a share of listings currently on the market, not a share of sales, and not the size of any discount. A listing cut by $1,000 and a listing cut by $100,000 count identically. There is no public free dataset of discount magnitude at state or county grain, so that column does not exist here rather than being estimated.
- No filter at state grain. All 51 state-level regions (the 50 states plus the District of Columbia) report the field for May 31, 2026, with a range of 17.3% to 36.5% and a median of 27.2%. There is no thin-market tail to trim, so nothing is trimmed.
- The county filter, and why it exists. Our county index file does not carry this field at all, so the county table is built by reading all 3,073 county files individually. County reporting months are not uniform — 223 counties are on an older month, with the tail running back to September 30, 2020 — so a county is ranked only if its latest month is May 31, 2026. On top of that, a "share of active listings" computed over a handful of listings produces degenerate readings: before filtering, 42 counties read above 60% and 12 of those read exactly 100%. Requiring 100 sales in the month removes all of them and leaves 640 counties spanning 9.6% to 63.5%.
- Sale-to-list ratio is a different measurement and it is on the table on purpose. It is the closing price divided by the final asking price, averaged over homes that sold. The negotiation gap column is simply 1 minus that. States can and do rank high on price cuts while still closing near or above ask, which is the single most useful thing on this page and the reason both columns are here.
- This is a level, not a trend, and not a forecast. Nothing here predicts prices. If you want the change-over-time view, that is market movers; the five-factor downside model is the crash-risk methodology; the five-year price projection with its backtest is the state forecast.
- What percent of home listings have a price cut right now? Across the 50 states plus the District of Columbia, the median is 27.2% of active listings carrying a seller price reduction, as of May 31, 2026. Indiana is highest at 36.5% and Hawaii is lowest at 17.3%. Everywhere else falls between those two, so there is no state where price cuts are rare and none where they are close to universal.
- Does a price cut mean the housing market is crashing? No. A reduction means the initial asking price was above what the market cleared, which is a statement about the list price, not about home values. In this snapshot not one of the 2,884 counties reporting the field reads zero and the lowest state still sits at 17.3%, so the useful question is the level relative to other markets and to that market's own history rather than whether cuts are happening at all. Downside risk is a separate composite of five factors, documented at /methodology/crash-risk/.
- Which state has the most price cuts? Indiana, at 36.5% of active listings, as of May 31, 2026. At county grain, among counties reporting that month with at least 100 sales, the highest is Columbia County in Georgia at 63.5%.
- Is this the same as selling below asking price? No, and both columns are on the state table so you can see them diverge. Price cuts are the share of listings currently on the market where the seller has lowered the ask. Sale-to-list ratio is the final sale price divided by the last asking price on homes that actually closed. A seller can cut twice and still close at full ask of the reduced price, which counts as a price cut and as a 1.00 sale-to-list ratio at the same time.
- Market data as of May 31, 2026, which is the Redfin reporting month, not the day we ran the pipeline. The pipeline last ran July 30, 2026; that date describes when the files were built and nothing about the market. Related: listing velocity decay, seller motivation, market movers, county distress pressure, months of supply by state, overvalued markets, state price forecast, HomeStats vs Reventure, all sources.
Sources: Redfin Data Center — PRICE_DROPS, AVG_SALE_TO_LIST, SOLD_ABOVE_LIST, MEDIAN_DOM, HOMES_SOLD, MEDIAN_SALE_PRICE, monthly market tracker, reporting month May 31, 2026. Redfin publishes this data under its own data center terms. Every figure above is recomputable from the free per-region JSON — /api/states/{slug}.json and /data/counties/{slug}.json, both carrying current.priceDropPct; the endpoint index is at /api/index.json. Full source list at /sources/.