Who Actually Gets a Mortgage
Every other housing number on this site describes what homes cost. This one describes who got approved and who was turned down. Under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, every lender above a size threshold reports every application, and the CFPB publishes it at the record level — no key, no signup, no per-record charge. A market can be cheap and still be closed to you.
Find your county
A state number is an average of places that do not resemble each other. Type a county or a state and see what lenders actually did there.
3,129 counties and 51 states. Counties with fewer than 50 ruled-on applications are listed without a rate — at that size a handful of files moves it several points.
The spread is the story
A lender said no to 30.2% of the applications it ruled on in Mississippi, and 14.1% in North Dakota — a 16.1-point gap between two states in the same national credit market, in the same year, under the same federal rules. Denial rate is not a house-price story. It tracks income, existing debt, property condition and the mix of lenders operating locally, which is why it moves independently of everything else on this site.
Hardest states to get approved
- Mississippi30.2%
- Louisiana29.9%
- Florida28.6%
- Hawaii28.3%
- West Virginia27.9%
- Alabama26.4%
- Georgia26.2%
- Texas26.2%
- New Mexico25.9%
- Maryland25.2%
Easiest states to get approved
- North Dakota14.1%
- Nebraska15.7%
- Iowa15.8%
- South Dakota16.2%
- Minnesota17.0%
- Wisconsin17.1%
- Vermont18.6%
- Idaho18.7%
- Alaska18.8%
- Kansas19.1%
Largest average loan
- District of Columbia$752,391
- Hawaii$603,187
- California$602,406
- New York$500,269
- Massachusetts$473,997
- Washington$461,879
- Colorado$437,262
- New Jersey$424,371
- Montana$392,556
- Utah$382,433
Most concentrated lending
Share of all originations held by the five largest lenders. High concentration means fewer places to shop a marginal file.
- Alaska36.2%
- Vermont35.2%
- Utah32.8%
- Hawaii32.5%
- Idaho30.3%
- Rhode Island30.2%
- North Dakota29.4%
- Iowa27.9%
- Montana27.8%
- Michigan27.0%
All states, ranked by denial rate
Purchase share separates markets where lending is dominated by people buying homes from markets running on refinancing and cash-out. Lender count is how many institutions reported at least one application in the state — a rough proxy for how many doors you can knock on.
| # | State | Denial Rate | Originations | Volume | Avg Loan | Purchase Share | Lenders | Top-5 Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mississippi | 30.2% | 54,718 | $11.0B | $200,188 | 55% | 684 | 25% |
| 2 | Louisiana | 29.9% | 69,272 | $16.3B | $235,957 | 60% | 714 | 21% |
| 3 | Florida | 28.6% | 491,046 | $183.5B | $373,739 | 60% | 1,969 | 21% |
| 4 | Hawaii | 28.3% | 19,858 | $12.0B | $603,187 | 50% | 322 | 33% |
| 5 | West Virginia | 27.9% | 29,629 | $6.1B | $207,272 | 58% | 568 | 24% |
| 6 | Alabama | 26.4% | 115,118 | $28.3B | $245,790 | 55% | 979 | 21% |
| 7 | Georgia | 26.2% | 242,931 | $79.7B | $328,249 | 53% | 1,186 | 20% |
| 8 | Texas | 26.2% | 526,689 | $186.2B | $353,588 | 68% | 1,536 | 20% |
| 9 | New Mexico | 25.9% | 39,313 | $12.3B | $313,896 | 58% | 599 | 22% |
| 10 | Maryland | 25.2% | 126,664 | $45.0B | $355,240 | 50% | 804 | 22% |
| 11 | New York | 24.9% | 232,239 | $116.2B | $500,269 | 52% | 734 | 23% |
| 12 | District of Columbia | 24.5% | 9,300 | $7.0B | $752,391 | 59% | 477 | 22% |
| 13 | Kentucky | 24.5% | 100,653 | $23.7B | $235,608 | 51% | 850 | 20% |
| 14 | South Carolina | 24.4% | 143,083 | $45.6B | $318,805 | 60% | 1,138 | 20% |
| 15 | Arkansas | 24.2% | 66,490 | $18.1B | $272,752 | 58% | 801 | 22% |
| 16 | Oklahoma | 24.2% | 79,051 | $18.6B | $235,491 | 60% | 815 | 19% |
| 17 | New Jersey | 24.1% | 178,220 | $75.6B | $424,371 | 46% | 868 | 20% |
| 18 | North Carolina | 23.8% | 281,159 | $89.6B | $318,627 | 53% | 1,242 | 24% |
| 19 | Rhode Island | 23.8% | 26,004 | $9.0B | $346,989 | 41% | 454 | 30% |
| 20 | California | 23.7% | 572,268 | $344.7B | $602,406 | 45% | 1,122 | 23% |
| 21 | Michigan | 23.6% | 229,505 | $57.2B | $249,095 | 47% | 966 | 27% |
| 22 | Delaware | 23.5% | 27,033 | $8.1B | $297,803 | 52% | 549 | 20% |
| 23 | Nevada | 23.2% | 69,682 | $26.6B | $381,858 | 55% | 625 | 23% |
| 24 | Pennsylvania | 23.1% | 272,809 | $65.9B | $241,625 | 45% | 1,101 | 19% |
| 25 | Ohio | 22.8% | 277,933 | $63.7B | $229,280 | 48% | 1,080 | 24% |
| 26 | Tennessee | 22.8% | 176,247 | $56.8B | $322,100 | 52% | 1,259 | 19% |
| 27 | Illinois | 22.6% | 232,591 | $70.0B | $300,865 | 54% | 1,138 | 21% |
| 28 | Connecticut | 22.4% | 74,717 | $27.0B | $361,741 | 48% | 683 | 19% |
| 29 | Arizona | 21.4% | 183,878 | $69.0B | $375,254 | 52% | 1,066 | 25% |
| 30 | New Hampshire | 21.1% | 35,609 | $12.6B | $354,698 | 43% | 542 | 27% |
| 31 | Virginia | 21.1% | 203,054 | $77.6B | $382,118 | 51% | 1,004 | 22% |
| 32 | Indiana | 21.0% | 178,349 | $43.2B | $242,490 | 49% | 1,020 | 16% |
| 33 | Maine | 20.8% | 35,498 | $10.3B | $291,538 | 46% | 536 | 24% |
| 34 | Colorado | 20.7% | 156,418 | $68.4B | $437,262 | 52% | 1,101 | 23% |
| 35 | Massachusetts | 20.6% | 135,614 | $64.3B | $473,997 | 46% | 788 | 22% |
| 36 | Washington | 20.4% | 175,441 | $81.0B | $461,879 | 49% | 812 | 23% |
| 37 | Wyoming | 20.3% | 13,328 | $4.2B | $312,372 | 55% | 414 | 24% |
| 38 | Oregon | 20.2% | 89,385 | $32.8B | $367,263 | 49% | 700 | 22% |
| 39 | Utah | 20.1% | 95,957 | $36.7B | $382,433 | 46% | 580 | 33% |
| 40 | Missouri | 19.4% | 146,780 | $36.0B | $244,962 | 54% | 1,013 | 19% |
| 41 | Montana | 19.3% | 23,001 | $9.0B | $392,556 | 51% | 553 | 28% |
| 42 | Kansas | 19.1% | 60,511 | $15.2B | $250,620 | 55% | 761 | 18% |
| 43 | Alaska | 18.8% | 11,907 | $4.0B | $339,537 | 64% | 255 | 36% |
| 44 | Idaho | 18.7% | 56,607 | $18.5B | $326,740 | 52% | 594 | 30% |
| 45 | Vermont | 18.6% | 13,418 | $3.7B | $277,539 | 48% | 325 | 35% |
| 46 | Wisconsin | 17.1% | 154,669 | $38.4B | $248,244 | 43% | 930 | 22% |
| 47 | Minnesota | 17.0% | 122,789 | $36.6B | $297,953 | 56% | 866 | 21% |
| 48 | South Dakota | 16.2% | 17,111 | $4.8B | $281,591 | 58% | 393 | 25% |
| 49 | Iowa | 15.8% | 75,933 | $16.2B | $213,952 | 55% | 739 | 28% |
| 50 | Nebraska | 15.7% | 43,920 | $11.5B | $262,177 | 56% | 558 | 24% |
| 51 | North Dakota | 14.1% | 14,333 | $4.0B | $276,680 | 58% | 329 | 29% |
Method, and one number that is easy to misread
- Denial rate counts only applications a lender actually ruled on. HMDA action codes 1 (originated) and 3 (denied). Withdrawn applications and files closed for incompleteness are excluded from both the numerator and the denominator. Folding those in would inflate the figure and blame lenders for borrower-side outcomes — several published "denial rate" tables do exactly that, which is why our numbers run lower than theirs.
- State and county grain, not neighbourhood. HMDA carries census tract on every record, so tract-level analysis is possible from the same free endpoint — it is simply not what this page does. The record-level CSV export returns the full 99-column schema including rate spread, total loan costs, discount points, LTV, DTI and applicant income.
- Volume is originated dollars, not property value. A high average loan reflects both expensive housing and larger down payments being unavailable.
- Two counties have no average loan, on purpose. A small number of HMDA records are commercial-scale loans filed against an ordinary residential county, and no filter the API offers separates them — the worst offenders are tagged as single-unit properties. In the 2025 data, one record accounts for roughly nine-tenths of its county's entire reported volume, which drags that county's average loan to several times the local median while leaving the denial rate untouched. Where the average exceeds three times a county's own median sale price and $600,000, we publish no average rather than a number that describes one filing. Counts, and therefore every denial rate on this page, are unaffected.
- Small counties show no rate. Below 50 ruled-on applications a handful of files moves the rate by several points, so those counties report loan counts only.
- Coverage threshold. Institutions below the reporting threshold do not appear. In rural states with many small lenders this understates true lender count.
- National figures are summed from the 51 state pulls. The API rejects a request with no geography filter, so there is no single "national" call to make.
Source: CFPB HMDA data browser (2025 filing year, pulled 2026-08-23). Platform code: cfpb/hmda-platform. Public domain (CC0). See also the interactive map for the denial-rate layer, and all data sources.